Primary Targets: House (part 1)

A recent diary talked about possible primary targets in the House.  One simple method is to select those who meet three criteria:  the most conservative overall Democrat from their state's House delegation (44 possible), voted to continue funding for the war in Iraq (30 of the 44), and also come from districts either carried by John Kerry or effectively tied.  There are a total of six House members who meeet these criteria.  All of them, at leaast on paper, seem worthy of a primary challenge.  Let's look at the six.

At the top of my list is Rob Andrews.  Andrews is an embarrassment and a threat.  He comes from south Jersey, specifically the machine politics of NJ-1 (Camden County and surroundings).  Andrews comes from the most overwhelmingly Democratic district of any of the six (60.6% for Kerry).  He is the most conservative vote from the NJ Democrats in the House (a 78.34 score from Progressive Punch).  The heart of his district is Camden, the saddest city in New Jersey.  Back in the 1960's Camden had a population of over 100,000.  Today, it's 43,000 and dropping.  The city's literally bankrupt.  The State runs the schools.  And Rob Andrews?  He's the Harvad educated messenger boy for the Norcross machine.  The people deserve better.  The people need more.

The Norcross Machine is the bete noire of the state's biggest paper, the Newark Star Ledger.  It also is constantly fighting Democratic governors from a conservative view point.  George Norcross comes from a union management background.  But he carries water for the business interests.  It's not a nice picture.  And, to cap it off, unlike the Essex or Hudson machines, this one barely delivers at the polls.  Andrews has $2,074,365 cash on hand, one of the largest hordes of anybody in congress.  Every time an opening comes up for Governor or Senator in this state he is constantly mentioned as one of the front runners, solely because of his cash.  Just about the only loser the Democrats could nominate would be Andrews, who would be crucufied for his ties to the Norcross machine.  He needs to be ousted.  At the very least, a vigorous primary would cut that cash horde down to size.

The second most Democratic district on the list is NV-1 held by Shelley Berkly.  Berkly has a Progressive Punch score of 80.83 and comes from a district where John Kerry got 56.57% of the vote (he lost the state).  Nevada Democrats came close in the two other Congressional Districts in the state but like a lot of elections seeemed to lose the close ones.  Both Kerry and Gore lost narrowly here.  The Kerry lose was close enough that the state as a whole rates a slight Democratic lean (very slight).  Nevada Democrats (as seen from a distance) are in need of fighting spirit to combat the usual Republican dirty tricks.  Time for a new leader on the House front?

Dutch Ruppersberger represents the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland and a few Baltimore suburbs.  His Progressive Punch score is 80.0; Kerry got 54.07% from the district.  Ruppersberger has a $381,000 war chest according to Open Secrets (no report was filed for 3/31 according to fec.gov.  Ruppersberger could represent the second half of a nice daily double (with Al Wynn).  IIRC, Dutch is the former county exec from Baltimore County, the same position Spiro Agnew used to gain fame. illicit fortune, and then infamy.

Ron Kind in Wisconsin comes from a 51.37% Kerry district, and carries a Propgressive Punch score of 80.33.  He has $426,746 cash on hand according to fec reports, the most for any Wisconsin Democrat in the House.  Like the others hewre, he also voted to continue the war.

Jim Costa can be had.  The California Democrat ranks 33rd and last among California Democrats in the House with a Progressive Punch score of just 75.68.  Costa has only $256 K on hand.  He's not a long term member.  The district voted 50.63% for Kerry.  In a dead giveaway, California Republicans left him unopposed in 2006 (Costa was either a freshman or a second termer IIRC).

The final name on the list is Leonard Boswell.  Boswell has no business in Congress.  He's aging, has health problems and is an anemic campaigner who drained $800 k from the DCCC in 2006. Boswell does fund raise well (he now has $320 K on hand due to first quarter fund raising) but he needs it and more.  His Progressive Punch score of 69.62 is the worst on this list.  Put the old guy out of his misery.  Replace him!  (I've seen a video tape of Boswell's stump speech, boring!).



Display:


Re: Primary Targets: House (part 1) (none / 0)

We'd have a tough time holding Boswell's district if he was gone.


by Marylander on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 03:41:30 PM EST

Re: Primary Targets: House (part 1) (none / 0)

We have a tough time holding the district with Boswell.  What does he bring to the table that a younger, more energetic candidate would not?  David Loesback didn't get ant DCCC money and took an Iowa district (admittedly one with a better PVI) against a 30 year veteran of Congress.  This iwas a 49.6 to 49.0 district in 2004 (pro-Bush) giving it a slight Democratic lean.  In 2006 the state swung more Democratic.  If not now, when ....

We're not talking a conservative Democrat from a truly conservative district, I eliminated them,  We shouldn't run a primary against Tim Holden, John Salazar, Jim Matherson, Dan Boren, Dennis Moore, Earl Pomeroy, Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (most have been married recently), Ike Skelton, Marion Berry, Charlie Melancon, Bud Cramer, Gene Taylor, John Tanner, Ben Chandler, Jim Marshall, John Spratt, Rick Boucher, Mike McIntyre, Alan Mollohan or Baron Hill.  


by David Kowalski on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 05:10:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Boswell underperformed in 2006 (none / 0)

In 2004 his margin in Polk County (Des Moines and most suburbs) was 26,000 votes, while Kerry only won Polk County by about 9,000.

But in 2006 Boswell seriously underperformed the top  of the ticket. I can't remember the numbers, but Culver got way more votes for governor than Boswell did for the House seat.

People are getting very tired of him. Many progressives left that line blank on the ballot because he is so unpalatable.

I think a primary challenge would not succeed, but if he felt threatened his voting behavior might improve.

The problem for Iowa Democrats will come after 2010, when we lose a House district. Presumably Boswell will retire at that time, and we'll be stuck with a 2-2 House delegation.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 02:23:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Primary Targets: House (part 1) (none / 0)

You've got no chance against Shelley Berkley. I'll state that point blank. That's my district, NV-1.

Outsiders don't seem to realize there are only a handful of issues that matter in Nevada. As long as the politician doesn't self destruct by being pro-Yucca Mountain or anti-gambling, they can essentially coast.

Berkley stood up on the House floor last September when Bill Frist at the last second attached the ban on internet gambling bill to an unrelated port security bill. She was by far the most vocal and impressive House member that night, emphasizing how absurd it was.

Here is a clip of her comments that night. Frankly, all she has to do is play snippets of this during a primary challenge and she'll squash anyone who is put up against her:

http://www.macpokeronline.com/video/lega l/shelly-berkley-vs-congress2/

Berkley has subsequently proposed a roll back of the internet gambling ban, working with Barney Frank and others. Jon Porter and Dean Heller have been co-sponsors of the legislation also, making them less vulnerable to Democratic challenges.

Otherwise, it's amazing how differently Nevada politics is critiqued locally compared to national websites. Local political analysts talk about a GOP "lock" on the state and how distinctly it tilts to the right. Then I continually read on progressive websites that Nevada is moving our way. I've been here since the '80s and frankly I don't detect any change. The Hispanic influx is not felt yet since too high a percentage are not citizens or not yet 18. Las Vegas is growing rapidly but much of it is high income transplants  in the north and west sections of the city, filling up new residential developments. NV-1 under performs in terms of turnout, particularly in midterms. Last year the percentage of self identified conservatives jumped to 36% in the Nevada exit poll, the highest I've ever seen it and completely opposite of the national trend in swing states. Washoe (Reno) has shown signs of drifting our way so this state can be won with the proper nominee, but don't put too much stock in that slight partisan index switch to our side in '04. We better win the national popular vote if we expect Nevada to come along for the ride.


by Gary Kilbride on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 04:22:39 PM EST

Re: Primary Targets: House (part 1) (none / 0)

I almost excluded Berkly but she met the criteria.  My argument for excluding her would be that two other CDs are held by Republicans.  We can win them.  Gibbons' problems as governor may even give us a leg up there.  

Republicans in Nevada always play dirty.  I went through the state on election day in 1988 and the TV news was buzzing about Republicans trying to interfere/delay voting in Vegas for the after work group.  I actually rode back to the airport in a van with the governor's mother-in-law.  She was incensed about the mud thrown at her son-in-law, Richard Bryan.  Republicans didn't do that in Ohio. (well, that's another story).  And I remember dirty tricks more recently about voter registration forms.

Berkly may meet the local minimum but is the political culture in Vegas what Democrats need to win, Gary?  Maybe the answer is not to challenge Berkly (a safe Democratic district) but to get somebody with some spine in one of the other two districts.  Jon Ensign is not our friend.  Period.  What's your suggestion?


by David Kowalski on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 05:21:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.